![]()
|
Standard 4.A – Faculty Selection, Evaluation, Roles, Welfare, and Development The selection, development, and retention of a competent faculty is of paramount importance to the institution. The faculty’s central responsibility is for educational programs and their quality. The faculty is adequate in number and qualifications to meet its obligations toward achievement of the institution’s mission and goals. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.1 |
The institution employs professionally qualified faculty with primary commitment to the institution and representative of each field or program in which it offers major work. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.A.2 |
Faculty participate in academic planning, curriculum development and review, academic advising, and institutional governance. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.3 |
Faculty workloads reflect the mission and goals of the institution and the talents and competencies of faculty, allowing sufficient time and support for professional growth and renewal. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.4 |
Faculty salaries and benefits are adequate to attract and retain a competent faculty and are consistent with the mission and goals of the institution. Policies on salaries and benefits are clearly stated, widely available, and equitably administered. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.5 |
The institution provides for regular and systematic evaluation of faculty performance in order to ensure teaching effectiveness and the fulfillment of instructional and other faculty responsibilities. The institution’s policies, regulations, and procedures provide for the evaluation of all faculty on a continuing basis consistent with Policy 4.1 Faculty Evaluation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.6 |
The institution defines an orderly process for the recruitment and appointment of full-time faculty. Institutional personnel policies and procedures are published and made available to faculty. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.7 |
The institution fosters and protects academic freedom for faculty. (See Eligibility Requirement 11 and Policy A-8 Principles and Practices Regarding Institutional Mission and Goals, Policies and Administration. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.8 |
Part-time and adjunct faculty are qualified by academic background, degree(s), and/or professional experience to carry out their teaching assignment and/or other prescribed duties and responsibilities in accord with the mission and goals of the institution. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.9 |
Employment practices for part-time and adjunct faculty include dissemination of information regarding the institution, the work assignment, rights and responsibilities, and conditions of employment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.10 |
The institution demonstrates that it periodically assesses institutional policies concerning the use of part-time and adjunct faculty in light of the mission and goals of the institution. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard 4.B – Scholarship, Research, and Artistic Creation Scholarship, including research and artistic creation, is inherent in the work of faculty and students and is integrated in mutually supportive ways with instructional activities, regardless of the size or nature of the institution.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.1 |
Consistent with institutional mission and goals, faculty are engaged in scholarship, research, and artistic creation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.2 |
Institutional policies and procedures, including ethical considerations, concerning scholarship, research, and artistic creation, are clearly communicated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.3 |
Consistent with institutional mission and goals, faculty have a substantive role in the development and administration of research policies and practices. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.4 |
Consistent with its mission and goals, the institution provides appropriate financial, physical, administrative, and information resources for scholarship, research, and artistic creation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.5 |
The nature of the institution’s research mission and goals and its commitment to faculty scholarship, research, and artistic creation are reflected in the assignment of faculty responsibilities, the expectation and reward of faculty performance, and opportunities for faculty renewal through sabbatical leaves or other similar programs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.6 |
Sponsored research and programs funded by grants, contracts, and gifts are consistent with the institution’s mission and goals. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.7 |
Faculty are accorded academic freedom to pursue scholarship, research, and artistic creation consistent with the institution’s mission and goals. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policy 4.1 Faculty Evaluation As stated in Standard Four, the effectiveness and quality of an institution’s total educational program depend upon the presence of a competent faculty. Further, it is the institution’s obligation, in consultation with the faculty, to evaluate the performance of its faculty members and to provide for their development on a continuing basis. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standard Four also calls for faculty members to be safeguarded in their exercise of academic freedom. The protection of academic freedom does not lessen the need for performance evaluation of temporary or permanent members of the faculty to ensure, on a continuing basis, the effectiveness and quality of those individuals responsible for the academic program. This ongoing evaluation may take several forms, in accordance with the size, complexity, and mission of the institution, including, for example, annual merit salary evaluations of a significant nature, promotions, and/or tenure reviews, periodic post-tenure reviews, or reviews conducted in response to some institutional need. The requirement of this policy is that the accredited institution shall conduct a comprehensive evaluation of each faculty member in a regular and systematic manner at least once within each five-year period of service. The institution’s faculty evaluation process shall contain a provision to address concerns that may emerge between regularly scheduled evaluation activities. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In establishing a program of continuing faculty evaluation and in supporting a program of faculty development, institutions shall meet the following requirements:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To conclude, the requirement for the continuing evaluation of faculty performance is to be accomplished through the joint efforts of faculty and administration. The retention of a competent faculty helps ensure that the mission of an institution of higher education is being accomplished in a manner consistent with its accredited status. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adopted 1992/Revised 2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supporting Documentation for Standard Four |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Required Documentation:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Required Exhibits:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suggested Materials:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||